Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to RhinoScope undergo a double-blind peer review process, in which both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous.
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. The editorial decision is based on the reviewers’ recommendations, as well as the assessment of the Editorial Board.
The journal follows a standard peer review workflow, including initial editorial screening, external peer review, and final editorial decision (acceptance, revision, or rejection).
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. The editorial decision is based on the reviewers’ recommendations, as well as the assessment of the Editorial Board.
The journal follows a standard peer review workflow, including initial editorial screening, external peer review, and final editorial decision (acceptance, revision, or rejection).
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
